by hagop » 28 Jul 2008, 06:20
Himi-inch-enik,
I am not offended by your using lower case letters for proper nouns. Also, you are using perfect terminology -- I don't think anyone is misunderstanding you.
Please understand I don't want to come off as lecturing other people. That's not my intention. I believe firmly in the very obvious fact that you, me and the great majority of humans understand each others' thought because we have similar mental abilities. So, if a group of average intelligence people can understand something, so can most of the humans.
In this instance, we are talking about something that is very straight forward. Many (if not most) members of all ethnic groups in Turkey claim to have come from Central Asia. The Hemshinli are no exception to this reality. All of these claims are false with the obvious exception of those Turks who have significant gene contribution from Central Asian ancestors.
Now about your first point. You are correct in your observation that your ancestors could not have picked up the language from Armenians. Yes, they have always spoken it as a mother tongue and did not speak Turkish well up to recent times. Especially the women spoke very little or no Turkish a century ago. Since the women are the carriers of the language, the long tailed lie that some propagandists tell they learned to speak Armenian from Armenians falls flat on its face. This much we are in agreement. But I am puzzled by your second statement where you say the Hemshinli couldn't have been Armenians because you don't think it was ok in the Ottoman Empire to lose the religion but not the language.
Well, if what you say is true, then why do we have the Georgians, Laz, Pontic Greeks, Circassians, Bosnians, Pomaks, Cretans (Giritliler), Albanians, etc. speaking their languages to this day which is many hundred years after their conversion to Islam? Now the question to ask here is was the Ottoman Empire a Turkifying empire or an Islamicising empire? Of course it was the second until the latter years of Ittihat & Terakki rule.
So, from your words, we reach to a even stranger conclusion which makes me more puzzled. If, as you are claiming, the Hemshinli are neither Armenians and Turks, who are they? Ottoman records, Armenian church records, European travelers, the neighbors of the Hemshinli all say the Hemshinli were Armenians. There is no record of a different people anywhere. Even some Hemshinli people admit that they were Armenians. Now, why would all these people lie? Isn't there a single honest man among these peoples to say the truth? What about the culture, customs, family names? Were they manufactured as a part of this conspiracy? Why do the average Hemshinli looks like an Armenian? Is that manufactured too?
You see, you don't have to be an expert to ask all these questions.